Why was six not enough?

I've had trouble understanding why a woman who has no money, no husband and no job wants children in addition to the six she already had.

Now, I'm not one of those people who thinks the death threats against Nadya Suleman are appropriate or anything. That is, of course, terrible, and I think people should at least treat her with civility. But I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why she decided to undergo in-vitro fertilization when she already has far too many children than she and her mother can care for.

While her mother, Angela Suleman, recently said her anger at her daughter's decision was softened by the sight of her newest eight grandchildren, she has gone on record as being very upset by her daughter's actions.

Angela Suleman's entire retirement check goes towards helping Nadya and her children each month. Why would someone be so selfish as to pay more money to get a procedure done to bring even one more child into the world when your family is struggling to support you. Had Nadya gotten pregnant through natural means, I would never think the child should be aborted; but this woman paid to have this procedure done.

Nadya Suleman said in interviews that she went through a period of time where she was depressed after an injury during a riot at a mental hospital where she worked in 1999. She said the birth of her first child helped her spirits, and that she wanted a large family to make up for "certain connections and attachments with another person that I really lacked, I believe, growing up."

It is not a child's responsibility to provide some sort of connection that you lacked as a child. It's your job to make sure the child doesn't experience the same thing. Trying to make up for your childhood by having 14 children is selfish and is not at all thinking of their welfare.

In these dark days of economic recession, why would you want to use your mother's money to finance a procedure which would enable you to have who knows how many more children that you will be responsible for caring and providing for? Those poor children will have a difficult life, just because she wanted a large family.

I just don't get it. It's not fair to the children. It's not fair to her mother. And it's not fair to the taxpayers that now will have to pick up the slack for raising her children.

I'll leave you with one last thought: Even if none of this makes sense, why would you want to do this to yourself?

Ouch. Also, ew.